Wednesday, 28 January 2009

Key Concepts - Audience

Introducing Audience

You may wake up to the sound of the radio, play a walkman on your way into
college, pass billboards in the street and watch television or go to a film in the evening.
Some people have seen media audiences as being easily manipulated masses of people
who can be persuaded to buy products through advertising, or to follow corrupt leaders
through propaganda.
There have also been fears that the contents of media texts can make
their audiences behave in different ways – become more violent for example. On the other
hand there have been other critics who have seen the media as having much less influence and working in more subtle ways.

Historical Background

All of the different media that we think of as “The Media” are actually quite recent
inventions. If you were living a hundred and fifty years ago photography, film, television,
radio and computers as we know them would all have seemed like fantasies.

The cliché about pre-media times is that people made their own entertainment and there is obviously some truth in this.

The kinds of things that people did in their leisure time were either likely to be
fairly independent things such as reading, or they would involve mixing with many other
people such as going to a play or musical.

The arrival of the media changed a lot of this: while films are often watched in theatre sized audiences.

The vast majority of our times with the media are spent on our own or in small groups so in one sense the media can seem to split people up – you have probably heard the worry from parents that since the arrival of video games and portable televisions, children don’t go out as much as they used to.

On the other hand, there is an opposite sense in which the media can be seen to bring us closer together: if you watch a soap or look at a picture in the paper of Mike Tyson, the chances are that millions of people across Britain or even the world will have experienced the
same media event.

This brings with it another fear – that because so many people are seeing the same things and because they are often experiencing them alone without anyone to explain what is good and bad about them, the media has an unprecedented power to affect us in negative ways.

The audience about ‘mass’

The key ideas about media audiences that you should remember from the last section are
these:

• The media are often experienced by people alone. (Some critics have talked about
media audiences as atomised – cut off from other people like separate atoms)

• Wherever they are in the world, the audience for a media text are all receiving exactly
the same thing.

Questioning both ideas

These points led some early critics of the media to come up with the idea of media audiences
as masses. According to many theorists, particularly in the early history of the subject, when
we listen to our CDs or sit in the cinema, we become part of a mass audience in many ways
like a crowd at a football match or a rock concert but at the same time very different because
separated from all the other members of this mass by space and sometimes time.

Media producers and institutions quickly identified that there was not just one audience, or
one market. The audience can be segmented, and marketed to in different ways depending on
they way they have been defined. We’ll cover this more closely in our study of advertising
and marketing. but it’s worth taking a quick look now.
Obvious ways to classify audiences are by age, gender, race and location (where they live).
Others include the following:

Income bracket/status

One way to classify audiences is by their class, which is normally judged on the kind of job
the main wage-earner of the householder has.

A Upper middle class
Top management, bankers, lawyers, doctors and other professionals

B Middle class
Middle management, teachers, many 'creatives' eg graphic designers
etc

C1 Lower middle class
Office supervisors, junior managers, nurses, specialist clerical staff etc

C2 Skilled working class
Skilled workers, tradespersons (white collar)

D Working class
Semi-skilled and unskilled manual workers (blue collar)

E People at lowest level of income
Unemployed, students, pensioners, casual workers

5
Young and Rubicam’s Four
Consumers

As the concept of class became
less fashionable, advertisers
started thinking about audiences
in different ways. One of the
best-known was devised by the
advertising agency Young and
Rubicam.
Mainstreamers
Make up 40% of the population. They like security, and
belonging to a group.

Aspirers
Want status and the esteem of others. Like status symbols,
designer labels etc. Live off credit and cash
.
Succeeders People who have already got status and control.

Reformers Define themselves by their self-esteem and self-fulfilment.

LifeMatrix

One of the latest approaches to audience targeting has grown out of the field of Market
Research. The LifeMatrix tool, launched by MRI and RoperASW, defines ten audience
categories, centred around both values, attitudes and beliefs, and more fundamental,
demographic audience categories.

1. Tribe wired Digital, free-spirited, creative young singles
2. Fun/Atics Aspirational, fun-seeking, active young people
3. Dynamic Duos Hard-driving, high-involvement couples
4. Priority Parents Family values, activities, media strongly dominate
5. Home Soldiers Home-centric, family-oriented, materially ambitious
6. Renaissance Women Active, caring, affluent, influential mums
7. Rugged Traditionalists Traditional male values, love of outdoors
8. Struggling Singles High aspirations, low economic status
9. Settled elders Devout, older, sedentary lifestyles
10. Free Birds Vital, active, altruistic seniors

Audience reaction to even early versions of a media text is closely watched. Hollywood
studios routinely show a pre-release version of every movie they make to a test audience, and
will often make changes to the movie that are requested by that audience.
Different types of media texts measure their audiences in different ways.

Film Figures are based on box office receipts, rather than the number of
people who have actually seen the movie. Subtract the production costs
of a movie from the box office receipts to find out how much money it
made, and therefore how successful it has been in the profit-driven
movie business.

Print Magazines and newspapers measure their circulation (ie numbers of
copies sold). They are open about these figures - they have to be as these
are the numbers quoted to advertisers when negotiating the price of a
page.

Radio/TV Measuring the number of viewers and listeners for a TV/Radio
programme or whole station's output is a complex business. Generally,
an audience research agency (eg BARB) will select a sample of the
population and monitor their viewing and listening habits over the space
of 7 days.

If audience is a mass, it raises all kinds of questions about the power of the media to influence people – not just individuals, but whole sectors of society. There have been a number of theories over the years about how exactly the media work on the mass audience. Some of them are outlined below.

The effects/ hypodermic needle

According to the theory the media is like a syringe which injects ideas, attitudes and beliefs
into the audience who as a powerless mass have little choice but to be influenced – in other
words, you watch something violent, you may go and do something violent, you see a woman
washing up on TV and you will want to do the same yourself if you are a woman and if you
are a man you will expect women to do the washing up for you.

This theory has been particularly popular when people have been considering violence in films and indeed you will be spending longer later in the course considering this question. There have been films such as The Exorcist (Friedkin, 1973 – see image, left) and A
Clockwork Orange (Kubrick, 1971) which have been banned in the past, partly because of a belief that they might encourage people to copy the crimes within them.

The cultivation/ culmination theory

According to this, while any one media text does not have too much effect, years and years of
watching more violence will make you less sensitive to violence, years and years of watching
women being mistreated in soaps will make you less bothered about it in real life. We refer to
this process as desensitisation.

Many people have a general sense that the media do affect our behaviour
and advertisers certainly justify their fees by working on this assumption, but it can be
extraordinarily difficult to actually prove how much effect if any a text might have on an
audience.

The theory (1): Violence in the Media de-sensitises the audience to violence in
general.

According to this theory, violence in the media excites children but the more they see, the
more they need to excite them. The result being that they become less shocked by real life
violence. The first part is fine but it is very difficult to prove whether the second follows on
from it.

The theory (2): Violence in the media erodes inbuilt inhibitions against acting in certain ways.

This suggests that inhibitions about sexual and violent behaviour are broken down if it is seen
as normal on the screen, particularly if such behaviour is seen as being unpunished in films
etc. Worth thinking about here is the frequency of violence against women in the media.

Identification: Violence in the media releases tension and desires through
identification with fictional characters and events (catharsis)

Again all research on this is inconclusive but some psychiatrists claim to have successfully
used pornography to help sex offenders release their emotions.

Sensitisation: Violence in the media can sensitise people to the effects of
Violence

Obviously the opposite of 2 above. Again difficult to prove, but when filmed in a certain way, (e.g. Taxi Driver?) violence can be so shocking as to put people off violence and make them more aware of its consequences. Sensitisation to certain crimes, it is argued, could make
people more aware and more likely to report them.

Some critics of these kinds of theory have argued that the problem is not just with the idea
that the media has such obvious effects, but about the assumptions that mass audience theory
makes about the members of the audience.

One problem that people have suggested with mass audience theory is that it relies on the
assumptions of the people analysing the masses.

These key ideas are that:
• The media are often experienced by people alone. (Some critics have talked about
media audiences as atomised – cut off from other people like separate atoms)

• Wherever they are in the world, the audience for a media text are all receiving exactly
the same thing.

An atomised audience?

The first idea seems to be suggesting that because we often watch the media independently, it
has more chance of affecting us. Certainly many parents think this is true and will make a 12
point of sitting with their young children while they watch potentially disturbing programmes
so that they can have some influence on the way the children take in the messages and explain confusing issues, but do you feel adults need to be protected in the same ways.

The two step flow

As the mass media became an essential part of life in societies around the world and did not reduce populations to a mass of unthinking drones, a more sophisticated explanation was sought.

Their findings suggested that the information does not flow directly from the text into the minds of its audience unmediated but is filtered through "opinion leaders" who then communicate it to their less active associates, over whom they have influence. The audience then mediate the information received directly from the media with the ideas and thoughts expressed by the opinion leaders, thus being influenced not by a direct process, but by a two step flow. This diminished the power of the media in the eyes of researchers, and caused them to conclude that social factors were also important in the way in which audiences interpreted texts. This is sometimes referred to as the limited effects paradigm.

More versions of the effects model


The Frankfurt School

They articulated criticisms of a capitalist system which controlled media output, creating a stupefying mass culture that eliminated or marginalised opposition or alternatives.

Their approach to audience analysis ultimately fell out of favour because it suggested that
America would ultimately become a fascist state, in which people were controlled through
popular culture.

Moral Panic

This is where the idea of moral panics begins: a populist version of the effects model, which
makes direct connections between media messages and audience behaviour.

Uses and gratifications

According to uses and gratification theory, we all have different uses for the media and we make choices over what we want to watch. In other words, when we encounter a media text, it is not just some kind of mindless entertainment – we are expecting to get something from it: some kind of gratification.

In this model the individual has the power and she selects the media texts that best suit her
needs and her attempts to satisfy those needs. The psychological basis for this model is the
Hierarchy of Needs identified by Maslow. Among the chief exponents of this model are
McQuail and Katz.

1. Information: we want to find out about society and the world – we want to satisfy our
curiosity. This would fit the news and documentaries which both give us a sense that
we are learning about the world.

2. Personal Identity: we may watch the television in order to look for models for our
behaviour. So, for example, we may identify with characters that we see in a soap. The
characters help us to decide what feel about ourselves and if we agree with their
actions and they succeed we feel better about ourselves – think of the warm feeling
you get when you favourite character triumphs at the end of a programme.
3. Integration and Social Interaction: we use the media in order to find out more about
the circumstances of other people. Watching a show helps us to empathise and
sympathise with the lives of others so that we may even end up thinking of the
characters in programme as friends even though we might feel a bit sad admitting it!
At the same time television may help us to get on with our real friends as we are able
to talk about the media with them.

4. Entertainment: sometimes we simply use the media for enjoyment, relaxation or just
to fill time.

First of all, it ignores the fact that we do not always have complete choice as to what we receive from the media.

Reception analysis: audience as individuals

The most important thing about this that you should bear in mind is that reception analysis is
based on the idea that no text has one simple meaning. Instead, reception analysis suggests
that the audience themselves help to create the meaning of the text.

Preferred/dominant reading

The preferred reading is the reading media producers hope will take from the text. For
example, and advertisement for a McDonalds Big Mac is intended to encourage feelings of
hunger in the audience, and propensity to buy a McDonald’s burger the next time they’re
passing. Assuming the majority of the audience respond by salivating and rubbing their
tummies (!) this is also the dominant reading.

Oppositional reading

Audience members from outside the target audience may reject the preferred reading,
receiving their own alternative message. The health-conscious, anti-globalisation campaigners and vegetarians will most likely respond to the McDonald’s advert with frustration and annoyance.

Negotiated reading

The ‘third way’ is one in which audiences acknowledge the preferred reading, but modify it to suit their own values and opinions. A negotiated response to the McDonald’s advert might be “I love Big Macs – but one a month as a treat is all my figure can stand.” Morley's view of dominant, negotiated and oppositional readings of texts is a semiological approach because it recognises the importance of the analysis of signs, particularly visual signs, that shape so much of modern media output. It ties to our understanding of connotations, studied as part of media language.

Often when our views of the media differ, it can say as much about us as
it does about the media text itself.

We can never consider one example of the media on its own – we are always choosing
from many different alternatives and more confusingly our understanding of one text may be
affected by our knowledge of another – to go back to the earlier example the man watching
the Pussycat Dolls may have read about them in that morning’s Daily Mail.

It is very rare for us to concentrate fully on any media text – we may skim read through a
magazine or glance at various different channels while using the remote. Once again,
quantitative research cannot cope with this – it simply counts the number of texts encountered
but doesn’t consider whether the audience have taken them in.

The media can become an important part of the routines of our lives – you may want to
watch Neighbours when you get in from school or listen to the Chart Show every Sunday
when you do your homework. In these examples, the exact time and the way that the media
18 text fits in with the pattern of you day are almost as important as what the media text actually is.

Gender differences

One interesting thing that Morley found in his research was that there were clear differences in the uses that people made of the media in their everyday lives depending on their gender. He found that men tended to prefer factual programmes e.g. News and sports while women preferred fiction Soaps and other drama series. Also, men preferred watching the programmes
extensively while women tended to be doing something else at the same time. Another thing that he found was that if someone had control over what the family was watching, it was more likely to be the man – often with the remote control in his hand.

Wednesday, 10 December 2008

Analyse film trailer '300'

Costume - They were overalls and there is a bear. Showing his chest and skin. Like they did back in Roman times. The child is shown when he was young and the shot is looking up at him to show his superiority.

Lighting - The beginning is dark, king and princess is shown in light. Medium shot underneath 4/5 men on animals going to war. the lighting is dark but the person is surrounded by white mist to show they are good and fighting for good. At the end it shows the date it will come out and the name of the film in red blood to show violence and it is written in the sky to show the weather is dramatic.

Audience - Appeals to people who are into violence and wars and made up animals. Appeals to teenagers and young adults who enjoy mysterious films and make belief people.

Mise en scene - Snow on the moutins. Set in Sparta, kind of in Rome. Set in fields and battle zones to battle the enemies who tresspass the land. Sea and oceans.

Props - Swords, Knives, shields and arrows.There is also a setting at sea when enemies and the good do battle for there land, Sparta. Horses to ride on and do battle.

Setting - Mountains, set in Sparta and battle zones and fields. When all the enemies are running they are shown to be strong and powerful to destroy the good for the land. kissing to show there is a romance and love. The sound is dramatic and shows the difference between good and evil, when good appears there is powerful, victorious music.

Monday, 8 December 2008

Investigate a British independent film institution.

Green Street is a 2005 drama film about football holiganism in England. It was directected by Lexi Alexander and stars Elijah Wood and Charlie Hunnum. In the USA and Austraila, the film is called Green Street Hooligans and in England it was initially called Hooigans.

Produced by Donald Zuckerman and Deborah Del Prete.

Written by Lexi Alexander, Dougie Brimson and Josh Shelov

Genre: Drama

Distributed by Baker Street, OddLot Entertainment, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc

Released date was 9th of September 2005

Running time is 108 minutes

Country/ Language is England/ English

Gross Revenue was $3, 154, 346

Odd Lot Entertainment, founded in 2001 by Gigi Pritzker and Deborah Del Prete, develops, finances, produces and arranges distribution for commercial film properties in the $5-$60 million range, with box office viability in both the domestic and international markets. The company finances its activities through a combination of private equity, tax incentives, foreign sales, distribution and co-production structures, and various forms of debt.

Projects are acquired only after developing an individual strategic plan that focuses on financing, marketing and release elements. Odd Lot's long-term strategy is to build an asset-based company by owning and controlling its development process and actively growing its library of titles.

In April 2006 the company launched a foreign sales division, Odd Lot International. Led by Brian O¹Shea, its mandate is to license and arrange worldwide distribution for films the company produces while representing theatrical films produced by third parties. Recent projects include the Nazi period drama GOOD starring Viggo Mortensen, which premieres at the 2008 Toronto Int'l Film Festival; Freestyle Releasing¹s BOTTLE SHOCK with Alan Rickman, and action flick THE FIFTH COMMANDMENT; Odd Lot Entertainment's THE OPEN ROAD by writer/director Michael Meredith; the fantasy/adventure THE GREAT GHOST RESCUE and Magnolia's smash IRA & ABBY, which competed at the

2007 Deauville Film Festival and won Audience Awards at the L.A. Film Festival and HBO Comedy Arts Festival.

Other films: Buried alive, living hell, suburban girl, undead or alive, the open road, the spirit, sense and sensibilidad

http://www.oddlotentertainment.com/site_images/layout/spacer.gif

Odd Lot does mainly horror, drama and thriller movies but there are one or two romantic comedy’s and sci-fi’s.

Sunday, 16 November 2008

TV Drama, Eastenders




Albert Square. The Butchers, The Di Marcos, The Beales and the Fowlers. To create this title sequence, an aircraft flew over the east end of London at about 1000ft. taking photographs in strips. This was done over several days and about 800 photos were taken, developed and pasted together like a mosaic.

The main reason for an opening sequence is to: Introduce characters, Introduce what they do, The logo, Introduce the setting and it is music that relates to the show.

This music relates to the show because the starting is loud and has a shocking affect because its like a thumping noise, also the music is slow and unhappy but yet shows a little happiness and this links to the show as there are different times of happiness and sadness. Moreover when the opening music comes on viewers are automatically aware of what show is on because the theme music is catchy.

Created by producer Julia smith and script editor Tony Holland, Eastenders has remained significant in terms of the BBC's success and audience share, and also the history of British television drama, tackling many controversial and taboo issues previously unseen on mainstream television in the UK.

C - Costume .. No people
L - Lighting .. Grey/Blue colours
A - Angles .. Birdseye view facing down onto
East End of London
M - Mise en Scene .. All of
East End of London
P - Props .. Only shows the area
S - Setting ..
East End of London

Tuesday, 11 November 2008

Spiderman!...

Trailer For Spiderman 1 ...


Trailer For Spiderman 2 ...

Trailer For Spiderman 3 ...

Spiderman Cartoon Programme..

Advert for Spiderman On Burger King..


Spider-Man (also known as Spider-Man: The Animated Series) is an American animated television series featuring the Marvel Comics superhero Spider-Man, which ran for five seasons (65 episodes) starting November 19, 1994 and finishing January 31, 1998. The producer/story editor was John Semper, Jr. and production company was the Marvel Productions. Reruns can currently be seen on Toon Disney. and Fox Entertainment.

Spider-Man is a 2002 American superhero film based on the fictional Marvel Comics character Spider-Man. The film is the first in the Spider-Man film series. The film was directed by Sam Raimi and stars Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst and Willem Dafoe. The script was credited to David Koepp.

After being stuck in development hell for nearly 25 years, the film was released on May 3, 2002 by Columbia Pictures. The film received multiple good reviews, went on to break box office records, and become the highest grossing film of 2002. Spider-Man is the 2nd most popular film based on a comic book (after The Dark Knight) and the 33rd most successful film of all time.

The success of the film led to two sequels, Spider-Man 2 and Spider-Man 3.

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

Web2.0

Content Management System
WebDeck product overview

WebDeck is a web based application which lets non technical users update content on their website. It's easy to use for content authors, whilst retaining flexibility and power for more technical users. WebDeck has a multitude of features some of which are summarised on this page, but above all WebDeck is a sound, scalable and extendable base on which to launch any website.Please free to browse through the features, take a look at the screenshots and rolling demo. If you are interested in getting a more in depth information we do regular web based demonstrations, just call us or contact us online and we can set one up, or drop round and see you.
Major content management system issues

- When choosing a content management system there is a number of issues that appear time and time again. Make sure your CMS can handle these issues as a base set of requirements:

- No design constraints, set your designers free, they won't be as creative if there are limitations from the CMS

- Use all the available web technologies such as Flash, video, music, instant messengers, java applets and other popular widgets

- Make sure the platform is scalable, modular, flexible and extendable. WebDeck is Java based and easily scalable

- Make sure it's SEO friendly and can produce accessible sites that validate to W3C standards

- Security is always paramount when building sites with secure access. WebDeck allows management of website members using user groups and encrypted passwords
Creating articles and content

- WebDeck has an easy to use interface which lets non technical people create articles and work with content quickly and easily just like working with well known word processing packages.Some of the features of handling content include:

- WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) editing just like using Microsoft Word
Copy and paste text straight from Word and let WebDeck worry about the formatting
Add links to other pages or documents on the site

- Preview the page to see what it would look like on the website

- Create content in multiple languages
Working in teams

- WebDeck allows any number of users with varying levels of authority to login to the CMS and edit content, review changes and publish the website. WebDeck facilitates this teamwork using the following features:

- Users can be assigned a number of functional roles and permission to edit specific regions of content

- All users are assigned passwords which are encrypted and cannot be retrieved
Workflow rules allow the articles to be proof read and approved by editors before being published

- Versioning of articles prevents users from over-writing each others content un-knowingly

- After publishing the articles, the entire site can be reverted to a previous copy
Individual articles can also be rolled back to previous ver
sions
Accessibility

- WebDeck is fully supports the A, AA and AAA web accessibility standards and is fast becoming one of the most popular content management systems for running highly accessible sites. WebDeck's accessibility features include:

- Compliant with the latest web standards including XHTML 1.1 and CSS 2

- WYSIWIG toolbar button to help validate for accessibility compliance

- Templates are configurable to WCAG A, AA or AAA standard

- Forces key accessibility issues such as alt tags for images and labels for form fields
Search Engine Optimisation

- We pride ourselves on WebDeck's ability to enhance search engine positions. Many of our clients are enjoying much higher rankings thanks to the following SEO features:

- Vanity URLs, create shorter, more concise web addresses that are search engine friendly

- 3 types of meta data allow content to be classified correctly by search engines
URLs appear in / notation; no ugly query strings
- All pages are valid XHTML 1.1 strict and CSS 2
- Link checking ensures all internal links are correct
- Integrated tagging of content creates higher keyword density within articles, and allows browsing by topic as well as hierarchy
- Automatic page titles, or override as required
- Separate style sheet configured for search engines
Interactive features

- WebDeck has a number of tools to create interesting and sticky websites. We have launched numerous sites with interactive tools such as:

-Article ratings with voting and comments from website members

-Competitions both web and SMS, with quizzes and polls

-Integrated forums with swear filters and moderator tools

-Easy web form builder, for collecting, emailing and storing information

-Integrated events calendar, event booking and reporting
Other important WebDeck features

- These are some of the other features we want to highlight, things that are important, new and improved and in the media.

- WebDeck has an internal content tagging capability allowing articles to be tagged with various topic tags. Once tagged articles can then be grouped by similar tags, served to people who are interested in particular tags, or indexed and made easier to find by a tag based search

- WebDeck uses the Lucene search engine to fully index all pages, content tags and popular documents such as Word, Excel, PDF and more for better internal searches
Personalisation is achieved through the use of content tags and user groups within the system

- WebDeck has a complete web statistics reporting suit enabling marketing users to analyse the traffic and users that are visiting the site
All content within WebDeck can be syndicated via web services, XML, RSS and other syndication protocols.